Hold’em with Holloway: Analyzing a Questionable SHRPO Main Event Hand
On Tuesday, I took the opportunity to watch the Seminole Hard Rock and Poker Night in America’s live stream of four final tables from the Seminole Hard Rock Poker Open (SHRPO), which included the final table of the $5,250 buy-in $5,000,000 guaranteed No-Limit Hold’em Championship, a tournament that had a slight overlay as it attracted 907 players, 93 players shy of meeting the guarantee.
Omar Zazay ended up capturing the $1,000,000 first-place prize after defeating local poker dealer Brian Phillis in an epic heads-up battle. What’s more, the duo managed to outlast the defending champion, Daniel Colman, who saw his title defense come to an end in third place for $310,000.
I was actually surprised to see Zazay and Phillis make it to heads-up play. As I was watching, the two played a big pot with eight players remaining, one that could very well have resulted in an elimination. Instead, it played out a bit differently — and strangely.
I thought I’d examine the hand in question in this week’s Hold’em With Holloway by breaking it down street by street and offering my take on each.
The hand took place in Level 27 (40,000/80,000/10,000) with eight players remaining. On Hand #27, Zazay, who was sitting with roughly 3.7 million in chips, opened for 180,000 from the button holding . Phillis, who was sitting with approximately 3.5 million, opted to defend from the big blind with .
My Take: Nothing special yet. Most players would open the button with a wide range of hands, but in this case Zazay has a legitimately strong one. Of course Phillis doesn’t know this. Had he woken up with a hand like or better a three-bet could have been in order, but as it was he picked up suited one-gappers and decided to see a flop.
I actually like Phillis’ decision to call from the big blind. I’m a big fan of such hands because they tend to make things easy — either you flop something strong and play a big pot, or you don’t and ditch it without further investment. Plus, in this hand, Phillis was already in for 80,000, so it was just a bit more than a min-raise to see a flop.
According to the PokerNews Odds Calculator, Zazay was a 60.56% favorite at this point, while Phillis would win 38.93% of the time.
The flop had action written all over it. Phillis flopped an open-ended straight flush draw, which actually made him a 52.63% favorite. Meanwhile, Zazay had flopped top pair with top kicker, giving him a 47.37% chance of winning the pot. Phillis coyly checked, Zazay bet 200,000, and Phillis took his time before min-raising to 400,000. Zazay thought for a bit before reraising to 650,000, and Phillis once again hit the tank before making the call.
My Take: I love Phillis’ check on the flop. Most players are going to continuation bet in position, which is just what Zazay did for a little less than half the pot. I like the sizing as it’ll entice draws and most hands with a queen, eight, or six.
If I’m in Phillis’ shoes, I’m check-raising the flop 100% of the time. Even if my opponent flopped a set of queens — the nuts at that point — I’ve still got a 40.61% chance of winning the pot. And if he has a better flush draw, let’s say the for a pair and flush draw, I’ve still got a 31.21% chance of winning. So even in the two worst-case scenarios I’m drawing very much alive. Plus, a check-raise may result in a fold, which isn’t a bad result as I haven’t made my hand yet.
While I was glad to see Phillis check-raise, his sizing was terrible. Min-raising screamed of weakness and priced in any hand that caught a piece of the flop. Given he was out of position without a made hand, I’d have much rather seen him make it roughly 600,000. Soliciting a fold would be great, but getting chips in the pot in anticipation of making your hand also isn’t bad. Phillis’ move wasn’t going to result in either.
At that point Zazay three-bet to 650,000. Again, I’m not crazy about the sizing. Sure, you don’t want to scare off worse queens, say a or , or smaller pairs, but you also don’t want to price in draws. By making it just 250,000 more, Zazay was not only giving Phillis great odds to call, but opened the door for further action. If I were in his shoes, I would have bumped it to a million or so. That would have put Phillis in a much tougher spot.
I wouldn’t have been surprised to see Phillis shove all in; in fact, that’s probably what I’d have done in his shoes. Given the way things played out, I would have put my opponent on either a bluff, queens with a good kicker, or a flush draw. By moving all in I’d get a fold from a bluff, and could very well push out the other two hands. Even if my opponent calls, I’m drawing very much live.
Instead, Phillis just called, which basically turned his hand face up. At that point Zazay knew Phillis either held an inferior queen, or much more likely a draw of some sort.
The dealer burned and turned the , which paired the board. Phillis checked, Zazay bet 525,000, and Phillis tank-called.
My Take: After taking the line he did on the flop, Phillis was wise to check, especially with the paired board. Zazay was also wise to bet, but not the amount he chose. The way the hand unfolded suggested Phillis held a draw, so by betting just 525,000 into a pot of roughly 1.7 million, Zazay was giving his opponent great odds to draw. Phillis had to love the price and promptly put in the chips.
Had it been me, I’d have bet closer to 1.1 million, give or take.
The blanked on the river and action went check-check. Zazay tabled the winner to chip up to 5.33 million, and Phillis showed his hand before dropping down to 2.135 million.
My Take: Phillis was correct to check yet again. He paid to see the river, which wasn’t a scare card, so a steal attempt would have been suspicious. It was time for him to give up on the hand, which he did.
As for Zazay, his check isn’t terrible (he’d have been hard pressed if Phillis check-raised all in), but I would have went for value, say 800,000 or so. If Phillis missed his draw, he’d fold, which would result in the same outcome as checking. However, if he had a hand like of , there’s a good chance he’d pay it off.
The hand could have played out many different ways, but in this instance neither player lost nor won as much as they could have. To be honest, I didn’t think either player had a shot of going far after watching that hand, but they both proved me wrong. Being results oriented it worked out for both players. Had Phillis gotten aggressive with his straight flush, he’d likely have $475,000 less in his pocket (the difference between second and eighth place).
What are your thoughts? How would you have played the hand had you been in Phillis’ shoes? How about Zazay’s? Let me know in the comments section or by reaching out on Twitter @ChadAHolloway.
*Lead photo courtesy of SHRPO Blog.