Which is better, a small field or large field? % payout is the same but of course the large fields' payout is larger.

Just another KITNs. You'll get used to them.

05-10-2008 16:32
Halli
Hallo
@Dave
..in a large field you have more time to build up !!..and its easily to go down fighting the bubble

servus Lefti
05-10-2008 23:39
I think they both have their own merits larger is obviously good because of the prizepool but if u get too large it could end up that u have to take too many risks just to stay in that you wouldnt need to take in a smaller game. I think it depends on lots of things, starting chip stack, game, quality of players etc...
05-20-2008 22:08
Ok, I'll ask it differently....which is easier to:
1. Get ITM?
2. Win?

Just another KITNs. You'll get used to them.

05-20-2008 23:24
LOL the answer to that is quite clearly smaller, is it not? Thats surely like saying is it easier to come first in a marathon against one person or 50000 
05-21-2008 07:33
SMALL FIELDS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love em anything from 100 to 300 ppl is a great tourney online if u ask me.
Bigger tournaments like peach allready said require u to not get unlucky so many times it becomes unlikely to score high in the short run.
For instance winning a sunday million (this was like 2 years ago so probably even longer now) would on average cost u 14 years. For me thats a bit to long term to aim for.
05-21-2008 14:21
I feel that getting into the money is a lot easier with a bigger field, but then again u only win about 20%-50% of ur buy-in back. going deep where the money gets interesting is a lot harder and winning is close to impossible when playing against 2,500 other players.
I definitely focus on smaller fields now where i can actually aim for some final tabels
05-21-2008 17:26
I feel that getting into the money is a lot easier with a bigger field
did u mean smaller or am i a fooo ?
05-21-2008 17:30
lol
no i actually meant that...have the feeling its easier to get into the top 150 of 1500 than it is to get into the top 18 of 180...
05-21-2008 22:33
Here's a good example:
PokerStars WSOP Qualifier-$650 with 20 seat Guaranteed--probably a small field but only 20 seats.
PokerStars WSOP Qualifier-$370 with 200 seats Guaranteed--probably a huge field but 200 seats.
In which do you have the better chance to win a seat?

Just another KITNs. You'll get used to them.

05-22-2008 18:58
I believe in the PokerStars WSOP Qualifier-$650 with 20 seat Guaranteed--probably a small field but only 20 seats.
Only good thing about large fields, is the amount of fish that have qualified,
but then again would u rather play 200 good players or 700 good players (out of 7000)
05-28-2008 11:05
| News | Learn Poker | Play Poker | Live Reporting | Freerolls & Tournaments | Forum | Quick Room Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PokerNews.com is the world's leading Poker website. Among other things, visitors will find a daily dose of articles with the latest poker news, live reporting from tournaments, exclusive videos and an extensive online poker rooms section with detailed poker reviews, the best poker bonuses and so much more.
PokerStars is the largest online poker site offering the biggest amount of poker games and different game variations including Texas Hold'em, Omaha and other popular poker games. By joining PokerStars you can easily learn all the poker rules and poker strategy by playing free poker games. Join PokerStars and enjoy top quality online poker.
© 2003-2012 PokerNews.com All rights reserved